Stakeholders and the Creation of Communication Value in Digital Contexts

Strategic communication is presented as a central organizational function that supports value creation through stakeholder relationships. In contemporary organizational environments, communication is not only a process of transmitting information but also a mechanism for shaping trust, legitimacy, relationships, and engagement among stakeholder groups.

The article explains that digital communication platforms have transformed organizational communication into a more interactive process. Through social media, websites, and other digital channels, stakeholders can access, interpret, respond to, and redistribute organizational messages in real time.

A key issue identified in the introduction is the difficulty organizations face in demonstrating how communication activities generate value. Communication departments often use indicators such as visibility, engagement statistics, and campaign reach, but these indicators mainly measure outputs rather than the value experienced by stakeholders.

The article emphasizes that stakeholders are not passive receivers of organizational messages. They actively interpret messages based on their experiences, values, expectations, cultural backgrounds, and social environments, which influences whether messages are perceived as credible, relevant, or valuable.

Existing research has connected communication activities with organizational outcomes such as reputation, legitimacy, trust, brand equity, stakeholder relationships, and competitive advantage. However, much of this research still approaches communication value from an organizational perspective rather than from the perspective of stakeholder interpretation.

The introduction highlights a theoretical gap in the literature: although stakeholders are recognized as important to communication outcomes, existing studies do not sufficiently explain how stakeholder perception and interpretation function as mechanisms in communication value formation, especially in digital environments.

To address this gap, the study adopts Stakeholder Theory as its guiding framework. This theory helps explain how organizational success and communication value depend on stakeholder evaluation, perception, and interpretation of organizational actions and messages.

The study aims to explore how stakeholder perception and interpretation contribute to communication value formation in digital communication contexts. It focuses on how stakeholders interpret organizational communication and how these interpretations influence the realization of communication value.

The study uses a qualitative research design with a conceptual and interpretive orientation. This approach is appropriate because stakeholder interpretation of communication messages is subjective and socially constructed. The research is guided by Stakeholder Theory, which provides an analytical framework for understanding how stakeholder perceptions shape communication value and organizational legitimacy.

The study relies on secondary data from academic literature, including peer-reviewed journal articles, scholarly books, and theoretical publications related to strategic communication, stakeholder perception, digital communication, and communication value creation. The literature was reviewed systematically through academic databases and analyzed using conceptual dimensions such as stakeholder perception, stakeholder interpretation, communication value experience, and digital communication interaction. Trustworthiness was supported through careful source selection, triangulation of academic perspectives, transparent review procedures, theoretical grounding, and accurate citation of sources.

The article finds that stakeholder perception is the foundation of communication value formation. Stakeholders evaluate organizational communication based on information received, source credibility, prior experiences, and expectations toward the organization.

In digital communication environments, stakeholder perception is shaped by visibility and accessibility. Organizational messages are encountered alongside competing information and alternative viewpoints, so stakeholders evaluate communication within a wider informational context.

Prior stakeholder experiences strongly influence how communication messages are perceived. Positive experiences can strengthen trust and credibility, while negative experiences may create skepticism toward organizational communication.

The alignment between organizational communication and stakeholder values is also important. Messages that reflect ethical standards, shared norms, and social expectations are more likely to be perceived as authentic and meaningful.

Digital platforms amplify the role of social interaction in perception formation. Stakeholders often discuss organizational messages in online communities, and these discussions shape collective perceptions about credibility, relevance, and legitimacy.

The article also argues that stakeholder interpretation is central to the realization of communication value. Communication value is not produced solely by the organization but is co-constructed through stakeholder interaction, interpretation, and meaning-making.

Stakeholders interpret messages according to their experiences, expectations, and social contexts. In digital environments, interpretation often occurs in relation to comments, opinions, and discussions circulating online.

The relational context of communication influences stakeholder interpretation. Stakeholders compare messages with previous organizational behavior, public reputation, and perceived organizational intentions before judging whether communication is trustworthy.

Digital communication transforms stakeholders from passive receivers into active participants. By commenting, sharing, and reinterpreting messages, stakeholders influence the broader narrative surrounding organizational communication.

The article explains that communication value is also shaped by broader social and cultural contexts. Stakeholders interpret communication through cultural norms, social values, and collective expectations, which influence how messages are understood.

Digital communication environments support message visibility, interactive engagement, network amplification, collective interpretation, and persistent communication records. These functions enable stakeholders to construct meaning collaboratively and evaluate organizational consistency over time.

Overall, the findings show that communication value emerges through stakeholder perception, interpretation, and interaction rather than through unilateral organizational messaging. The study positions stakeholder interpretation as the key mechanism linking communication outputs with perceived value in digital communication contexts.

This study examined how communication value is formed from a stakeholder perspective within digital communication environments. The analysis shows that communication value does not arise solely from organizational messaging but develops through stakeholder perception, interpretation, and engagement with communication content. Stakeholder perception functions as the initial stage that shapes how communication messages are evaluated in terms of credibility and relevance. Digital communication environments further influence this process by enabling interaction, discussion, and the circulation of interpretations across stakeholder networks. Through these interactions, stakeholders actively participate in constructing the meaning of organizational communication. Stakeholder interpretation then transforms communication outputs into perceived value based on personal experiences, expectations, and social context. Communication value therefore emerges as an experiential and relational process shaped by interactions between organizations and stakeholders. This process demonstrates that communication value formation in digital environments is fundamentally dependent on stakeholder interpretation and engagement.

This study contributes to the field of strategic communication by clarifying the role of stakeholder perception and interpretation in the formation of communication value. The findings extend Stakeholder Theory by illustrating how stakeholders function as active interpreters who shape the value outcomes of organizational communication. Rather than treating communication value as a direct result of strategic communication activities, this study emphasizes the interpretive processes through which stakeholders evaluate communication messages. The analysis also contributes to existing literature by highlighting how digital communication environments intensify stakeholder participation in meaning construction. By integrating stakeholder perception, digital interaction, and value formation, the study provides a conceptual explanation of how communication value emerges within digitally mediated communication contexts. The findings help bridge the gap between organizational communication strategies and stakeholder experiences identified in earlier research. In doing so, the study strengthens theoretical discussions on the relational and socially embedded nature of communication value formation.

Future research should further explore the mechanisms through which stakeholder perception and interpretation influence communication value in different communication contexts. Empirical studies using interviews, surveys, or digital discourse analysis could provide deeper insight into how stakeholders experience and evaluate organizational communication. Comparative studies across industries or organizational sectors may also reveal how contextual factors influence stakeholder interpretation processes. In addition, future research could examine how different digital platforms shape the circulation and reinterpretation of communication messages among stakeholder communities. Investigating the role of algorithmic visibility, online communities, and network dynamics could offer valuable insights into the evolving nature of digital communication environments. Researchers may also explore the relationship between stakeholder interpretation and long term organizational outcomes such as trust, legitimacy, and reputation. By expanding the empirical understanding of these dynamics, future research can further refine theoretical explanations of communication value formation in contemporary digital communication settings.

Cruz, A. F., Costa, E., & Whately, E. (2025). Mapeamento de públicos como pilar estratégico da comunicação organizacional no contexto digital. Aracê. Direitos Humanos em Revista. https://doi.org/10.56238/arev7n8-263

Du, S., & Yu, K. (2017). Effectiveness and accountability of digital CSR communication: A contingency model. In Strategic CSR Communication (pp. 202-221). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315577234-14

Ehimen, S., Edheku, J. O., Akpojevwa, O. A., Otuedon, A. M., & Efanimjor, P. (2025). Stakeholder trust and metaverse corporate social responsibility communication: A strategic analysis of Nigerian consumer goods firms. Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights. https://doi.org/10.56294/ai2025165

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman.

Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective function”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364-369. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0066

Hakala, H., Nummelin, L., & Kohtamäki, M. (2017). Online brand community practices and the construction of brand legitimacy. Marketing Theory, 17(3), 341-358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593117705695

Laaksonen, S. M., & Porttikivi, M. (2021). Governing with conversation culture – Conditioning organizational interaction in a digital social movement. Information, Communication & Society, 24(11), 1583-1599. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1873401

Mamic, L. I. (2011). Contenidos e interactividad de las comunicaciones de responsabilidad corporativa en las empresas españolas del IBEX-35.

Oliveira, C., Martins, A., Camilleri, M. A., & Jayantilal, S. (2021). Using the Balanced Scorecard for Strategic Communication and Performance Management. In Strategic Corporate Communication in the Digital Age. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80071-264-520211005

Orazi, D. C., Spry, A., Theilacker, M., & Vredenburg, J. (2017). A multi-stakeholder IMC framework for networked brand identity. European Journal of Marketing, 51(4), 816-836. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-08-2015-0612

Pilgrim, K., & Bohnet-Joschko, S. (2022). Corporate Social Responsibility on Twitter: A Review of Topics and Digital Communication Strategies’ Success Factors. Sustainability, 14(24), 16769. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416769

Ravazzani, S., & Hazée, S. (2022). Value co-creation through social media: a multistakeholder, communication perspective. Journal of Service Management, 33(4/5), 606-631. https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-11-2021-0411

Schulz, D., Jonker, J. B., & Faber, N. (2018). Outside-in constructions of organizational legitimacy: Sensitizing the influence of evaluative judgments through mass self-communication in online communities. International Journal of Communication, 12, 2602-2624.

Strömsholm, J. (2017). Stakeholder perspective to personal brand value in social media: Turning the gaze from the self to the others (Master's thesis, Aalto University).

Veil, S. R., Sellnow, T. L., & Petrun, E. L. (2012). Hoaxes and the paradoxical challenges of restoring legitimacy: Dominos’ response to its YouTube crisis. Management Communication Quarterly, 26(2), 322-345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318911426685

Wiencierz, C., Moll, R., & Röttger, U. (2015). Stakeholderdialog auf Facebook – Entschuldigung und Verantwortungsübernahme als vertrauensfördernde Reaktion on Online-Beschwerden in sozialen Netzwerken. In CSR und Social Media (pp. 119-138). Springer Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-03396-5_7

Zerfass, A., Volk, S. C., Piwinger, M., & Röttger, U. (2021). Strategische Ausrichtung der Unternehmenskommunikation: Zieldefinition, Alignment mit Organisationszielen und Wertbeitrag. In Handbuch Unternehmenskommunikation (pp. 1-28). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-03894-6_21-1